[plt-scheme] Is there a set data-type?

From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Fri Feb 5 20:52:58 EST 2010

1. Sets and potentially infinite sets aren't esoteric. We need them everywhere. 

2. For 10 elements? Use a list, Luke, use a list. 

On Feb 5, 2010, at 8:12 PM, Todd O'Bryan wrote:

> I feel like I started a tempest in a teapot.
> I really just needed to check that an operation passed into a function
> (as a symbol) was one of the permitted operations. Roughly 10 members,
> but I didn't want to read through the list of all the operations each
> time I had to check. Thus, the question about (in my mind, finite)
> sets and my presumption that a hashtable would be a good
> representation.
> Sorry for not asking a more specific question and encouraging all this
> discussion about much more esoteric topics than I had intended to. :-)
> Todd
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme

Posted on the users mailing list.