[racket] syntax, differently

That's because it decides when to break greedily. It really ought to be 
a constraint solver.

Like TeX for Racket programs. Yeah.

Neil T

Robby Findler wrote:
> Pretty-print doesn't work all that well, when it gets close up against
> the 80 column limit. At least, that's my experience reading its
> output.
> 
> Robby
> 
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Jos Koot <jos.koot at telefonica.net> wrote:
>> pretty-print (with (pretty-print-columns 80))?
>> jos
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: users-bounces at racket-lang.org
>>> [mailto:users-bounces at racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Jos Koot
>>> Sent: 02 August 2010 16:44
>>> To: 'Robby Findler'; 'Horace Dynamite'
>>> Cc: users at racket-lang.org
>>> Subject: Re: [racket] syntax, differently
>>>
>>> WQhy would this be tricky?
>>> Jos
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: users-bounces at racket-lang.org
>>>> [mailto:users-bounces at racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Robby Findler
>>>> Sent: 02 August 2010 16:34
>>>> To: Horace Dynamite
>>>> Cc: users at racket-lang.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [racket] syntax, differently
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Horace Dynamite
>>>> <horace.dynamite at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I
>>>>> do wonder how tricky it will be do have a line-breaking
>>>> routine that
>>>>> can take as input the program I posted, and produce as output the
>>>>> program you returned.
>>>> That seems very tricky, at least to me.
>>>>
>>>> Robby
>>>> _________________________________________________
>>>>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>>>>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________
>>>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>>>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
>>
>>
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users