[racket] syntax, differently

I don't really have a rationale as to why, merely an absence of one as
to why not.

Robby

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Jos Koot <jos.koot at telefonica.net> wrote:
> WQhy would this be tricky?
> Jos
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: users-bounces at racket-lang.org
>> [mailto:users-bounces at racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Robby Findler
>> Sent: 02 August 2010 16:34
>> To: Horace Dynamite
>> Cc: users at racket-lang.org
>> Subject: Re: [racket] syntax, differently
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Horace Dynamite
>> <horace.dynamite at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I
>> > do wonder how tricky it will be do have a line-breaking
>> routine that
>> > can take as input the program I posted, and produce as output the
>> > program you returned.
>>
>> That seems very tricky, at least to me.
>>
>> Robby
>> _________________________________________________
>>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
>
>
>