rackets (Was: [plt-scheme] still stuck with typed scheme problem: "Expected Attribute, but got Attribute")

They're all terrible for that reason too. (Perl is fine, and if you need to,
you can just tell the search enginne to search for the litteral word).

Anyway, racket will likely be better than 'scheme' on that level, given how
loaded 'scheme' is as a word. It's not the best, but it's an improvement, in
my opinion. Maybe coupling PLT with the name will do enough to help.

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:

> On Apr 30, Fred Hebert wrote:
> > I'd simply say I dislike the name because it is again something
> > impossible to search for in a search engine without getting a lot of
> > white noise results all the time.
>
> See C, Python, Ruby, and I'm sure that if Perl was named that now
> google would happily correct queries to "pearl".
>
> --
>          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20100430/5c3f03ca/attachment.html>