[plt-scheme] check-expect not allowed in expression position?

From: Greg Hendershott (greghendershott at gmail.com)
Date: Sat Apr 3 07:32:34 EDT 2010

A few minutes ago I saw Eli's post about 4.2.5 ...

> * Our unit testing framework, schemeunit, is now included in the
>  distribution.  A graphical test runner is available via
>  schemeunit/gui.

as well as your reply to me. All makes sense now, thanks!

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Robby Findler
<robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> schemeunit is our testing framework. It has been in the nightly builds
> for quite some time, but will only be released in the ordinary release
> with the next release. Sorry for the confusion.
> Robby
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Greg Hendershott
> <greghendershott at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Consider using schemeunit instead of check-expect. That's the
>>> full-language test suite utility we expect to spend development effort
>>> on in the future.
>> Thinking you meant scheme/unit I looked through the docs but don't see
>> how it relates to testing. Sorry if I'm being dense, but what are you
>> referring to?
>> Thanks,
>> Greg

Posted on the users mailing list.