[plt-scheme] check-expect not allowed in expression position?

From: Carl Eastlund (cce at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Fri Apr 2 11:00:12 EDT 2010

To further clarify, "schemeunit" is completely different from
"scheme/unit".  That slash is significant -- one is "unit testing for
Scheme", the other is "units of Scheme code".  You can look up
"schemeunit.plt" at planet.plt-scheme.org to see the versions of the
testing framework available there; the latest version will be released
with PLT Scheme 4.2.5 shortly.

Carl Eastlund

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Robby Findler
<robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> schemeunit is our testing framework. It has been in the nightly builds
> for quite some time, but will only be released in the ordinary release
> with the next release. Sorry for the confusion.
> Robby
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Greg Hendershott
> <greghendershott at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Consider using schemeunit instead of check-expect. That's the
>>> full-language test suite utility we expect to spend development effort
>>> on in the future.
>> Thinking you meant scheme/unit I looked through the docs but don't see
>> how it relates to testing. Sorry if I'm being dense, but what are you
>> referring to?
>> Thanks,
>> Greg

Posted on the users mailing list.