| From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu) Date: Mon Jan 12 12:30:54 EST 2009 |
|
At Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:06:47 -0600, Robby Findler wrote: > You don't seem to need the full generality of kill-safety, since you > have a custodian that you know never dies. Nit-picking terminology: I would say that he needs a kill-safe abstraction, but that he doesn't necessariyl have to use `thread-resume' with a donated custodian. Matthew
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}