[plt-scheme] PLT projects waiting for contributors?

John Clements wrote:
>
> I suppose that one thing that nearly every SRFI could use would be a 
> good test suite.  There are a bunch of SRFI's that I've used (e.g. 19) 
> that have no test suite to speak of. In fact, you could even make that 
> part of the standards document, if you could agree on a format for 
> test cases...
>

If anyone would like to provide some SRFI test suits, I would be happy 
to check them in (for PLT. Each SRFI has a mail list that you should 
also post your test suite).

Chongkai