[plt-scheme] Linking units with multiple dependencies

On Sunday, December 20, 2009, Thomas Chust <chust at web.de> wrote:
> apparently I'm really quite dumb not to try out that syntax, but at
> least I have an excuse since the documentation of the linkage-decl part
> of a compound-unit form states that the third element in those lists is
> a plain tagged-link-id and no ellipses are specified, which makes the
> ... A B part in the above statement formally illegal ;-)
>
> I guess the documentation should be fixed.

I think the prose covers it correctly, but, yes, the grammar spec is
part of why I call the syntax "tricky." :)

Anthony