[plt-scheme] arglist-on-space?

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Eli Barzilay<eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
> On Aug 10, Lee Spector wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for expanding on the documentation possibilities -- probably
>> not the path I want to go down right now but good to know. I guess
>> the easy access to documentation in Common Lisp comes from the way
>> that definitions can include doc-strings which, under the right
>> compiler options, remain linked to the symbols at runtime.
>
> The problem is more substantial than that.  In PLT, the arguments are
> not as straightforward as they are in CL.  There was some discussion
> about this not too long ago, see the thread around this message:
>
>  http://list.cs.brown.edu/pipermail/plt-scheme/2009-April/032237.html
>
> Also, you might want to look at using the Geiser thing.

http://programming-musings.org/2009/05/14/geiser/