From: Grant Rettke (grettke at acm.org) Date: Wed Nov 26 11:29:16 EST 2008 |
|
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote: > So, to help gauge usefulness for this potential action, I'll revise the > question: > > Does anyone actually use (and expect to continue to use) the `(rnrs > mutable-pairs)' library in PLT Scheme's R6RS? Other than working on the TSPL homework, no, and, Jos' point would address that use case.
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|