[plt-scheme] Look at it differently: Why PLT?

From: Woodhouse Gregory (gregory.woodhouse at gmail.com)
Date: Wed Nov 19 21:56:56 EST 2008

Oh, yes, the documentation! It is superb. How could I have forgotten  
that?


There's a fine line between optimization
and not being stupid. -- R. Kent Dybvig

http://www.gwoodhouse.com
http://GregWoodhouse.ImageKind.com





On Nov 19, 2008, at 6:50 PM, Grant Rettke wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Greg Woodhouse
> <gregory.woodhouse at gmail.com> wrote:
>> That being said, everyone on this list is using, or at least  
>> interested in
>> using, PLT Scheme. Why?
>
> 1. Great documentation.
> 2. Vibrant community (its members are all "dialed in", and many of
> them are world class developers).
> 3. DrScheme
> 4. Language
> 5. Libraries
> 6. PLaneT
> 7. Runs "out of the box" with "batteries included" on nearly every OS.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20081119/3fd505d5/attachment.html>

Posted on the users mailing list.