[plt-scheme] Look at it differently: Why PLT?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- From the point of view of this noob, what attracted me to PLT instead
of other schemes/lisps
was your point 4 (or is it 3? :P ).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJJGxRTGtma8x8sd4RAuYiAJ4ztQAukmRIEaDP50uRsh5FXDAm7QCfSTAm
+xDdwHdxlrqa5sCC6tzHHjI=
=aMf8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


> 4. PLT Scheme is vital.

The community looks (at least from the outside) interested in building
stuff, not just preserving
what they see as sacred pillars, there are up to date documentation
and people seem nicer
to outsiders.
For example, I took a look at comp.lang.lisp and saw a lot of people getting
consciously hostile to other people who are obviously beginners, but
were asking perfectly
valid questions, which frankly drove me away very fast.
Here I've yet to see that, and I think that is very much related to do
with your point.
My 2 cents.

Hugs
-- 
Eduardo Bellani

www.cnxs.com.br

"What is hateful to you, do not to your fellow men. That is the entire
Law; all the rest is commentary." The Talmud