[plt-scheme] word completion for module based languages

I've checked in something so that the completion now should complete
all of the indexed variables (it now works for mysterx, when it didn't
before).

Thanks,
Robby

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Robert Matovinovic
<robert.matovinovic at web.de> wrote:
> Hello,
> some time ago I opened this thread and could fix part of my problems thanks
> you to all the replies.
>
> Since then I looked at line 2811 of framework/text.ss which Robby mentioned
> in the mail below, because autocompletion does only seem to work for
> something like scheme/base. I tested that Robby is right in that the list
> which is prepared for the completions holds actually every word that appears
> in any of the manual's indicies. But on the way before it is shown something
> happens to the content so that a lot of it doesn't show up. I wasn't able to
> find where this happens. But perhaps this is helpful to somebody who knows
> better than me to fix it.
>
> Robert
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: plt-scheme-bounces at list.cs.brown.edu
> [mailto:plt-scheme-bounces at list.cs.brown.edu] Im Auftrag von Robert
> Matovinovic
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 18:56
> An: plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu
> Betreff: AW: [plt-scheme] word completion for module based languages
>
>
> I see, I didn't make indicies in my manual what should fix my problem. Thank
> you. Robert
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: robby.findler at gmail.com [mailto:robby.findler at gmail.com] Im Auftrag von
> Robby Findler
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 16:00
> An: Robert Matovinovic
> Cc: Matthew Flatt
> Betreff: Re: [plt-scheme] word completion for module based languages
>
>
> Ah. Well, from what I can tell, the autocompletion code should be completing
> every word that appears in any of the manual's indicies.
>
> Matthew: does that look right to you? (line 2811 of framework/text.ss)
>
> I see that there is a bug with completions that they aren't picking up the
> characters before the insertion point to being the completion. I'll look
> into that.
>
> Robby
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Robert Matovinovic
> <robert.matovinovic at web.de> wrote:
>> Just to clarify, I don't ask for word completion of definitions in the
>> editing buffer, but for a language or a language extension which is
>> loaded by the language menu of DrScheme. My language supports an
>> interface for another software which uses a scheme dialect and has a
>> lot of extensions for programming that software. These numerous
>> extensions have quiet long names, which are difficult to remember
>> exactly. So I want to provide the word completion for them. Robert
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: plt-scheme-bounces at list.cs.brown.edu
>> [mailto:plt-scheme-bounces at list.cs.brown.edu] Im Auftrag von Robby
>> Findler
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 03:15
>> An: Eli Barzilay
>> Cc: Robert Matovinovic; plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu
>> Betreff: Re: [plt-scheme] word completion for module based languages
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org>
>> wrote:
>>> On May 20, Robert Matovinovic wrote:
>>>> I currently use DrScheme, version 3.99.0.25-svn17may2008 on Windows
>>>> XP to add documentation for a module based language which I
>>>> implemented as a tool.  I started with a simple example using my own
>>>> modules. The F1 shortcut to get the relevant docs for an item from
>>>> within the DrScheme window works fine.  But is there a possibility
>>>> to get only the help documents for the current language?
>>>
>>> It might be possible to do, I'm not sure about the kind of
>>> information that DrScheme has when it starts a help search.  (FWIW,
>>> the `help' form (in mzscheme) finds the right place for any binding.)
>>>
>>> (Skipping other issues that I cannot provide a helpful reply...)
>>
>> DrScheme used to be able to do that and I believe it will be able to
>> do that again in the future. I believe Eli and I have discussed this,
>> so I'm a little surprised by his reply, but one way or the other, we
>> should have that capability back before v4.0.
>>
>> As far as word completion goes, it currently does not consider the
>> buffer where you're editing. Others have asked for that too, so I hope
>> to get to it at some point.
>>
>> Robby
>> _________________________________________________
>>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>> http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>>
>> _________________________________________________
>>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>> http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>>
>>
>
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>
>