| From: Grant Rettke (grettke at acm.org) Date: Wed Dec 31 00:08:37 EST 2008 |
|
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:51 PM, LordGeoffrey <lordgeoffrey at optushome.com.au> wrote: > btw on a trivial note - the use of layman as a working programming seems > contradictory to me. Perhaps "a layman, for example a 'working programmer'" makes more sense here when you consider 'layman' in this context to mean "a person who does not belong to the profession of theoretical computer scientists".
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}