[plt-scheme] Faster CGI

From: Jay McCarthy (jay.mccarthy at gmail.com)
Date: Mon Dec 8 22:46:18 EST 2008

Ah, I understand now. Yes, I would recommend writing something like a
FastCGI wrapper, I imagine that the protocol is fairly simple, if
you'd like me to look it over and give any tips on controlling
resources (i.e., with custodians), I'd be happy to.


On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Henk Boom <lunarc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2008/12/8 Shriram Krishnamurthi <sk at cs.brown.edu>:
>> Yes, that's correct.  But the point is that they make it much more
>> friendly to use continuations if you so desire (ie, if you haven't
>> used the server w/ continuations in a year or two, you may want to
>> check whether these additions pass your necessary benchmarking).
> Ok, I see that point. If I am going to use the PLT Web Server then it
> makes sense to investigate those options to make using continuations
> affordable. The problem I was running into, though, was unaffordable
> memory usage even in the absence of continuations.
>    Henk

Jay McCarthy <jay at cs.byu.edu>
Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University

"The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93

Posted on the users mailing list.