[plt-scheme] Faster CGI

I understand.  In that case you would indeed be best off looking into
a FastCGI-based alternative.

Shriram

On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Henk Boom <lunarc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2008/12/8 Shriram Krishnamurthi <sk at cs.brown.edu>:
>> Yes, that's correct.  But the point is that they make it much more
>> friendly to use continuations if you so desire (ie, if you haven't
>> used the server w/ continuations in a year or two, you may want to
>> check whether these additions pass your necessary benchmarking).
>
> Ok, I see that point. If I am going to use the PLT Web Server then it
> makes sense to investigate those options to make using continuations
> affordable. The problem I was running into, though, was unaffordable
> memory usage even in the absence of continuations.
>
>    Henk
>