[plt-scheme] setup-plt --mode errortrace standard-module-name-resolver: cycle in loading

Matthew, this afterthought of yours has been a big win for us.  Since we 
started running our system with JIT disabled, we've consistently gotten 
very helpful trace info without needing Errortrace.  Thanks again.

(Not that I discourage anyone from using the JIT.  Our system does some 
unusual things that I imagine might contribute to the poor error traces 
when combined with JIT.  I will look into this in our system when time 
permits.)

Neil

Matthew Flatt wrote at 08/01/2008 11:20 AM:
> At Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:17:02 -0400, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>   
>> In the interim, is there anything I can do to improve the backtraces 
>> when debugging
>>     
>
> One more thought: it sometimes helps to disable the JIT. The JIT and
> the bytecode interpreter compute stack traces in different ways, and
> they usually produce slightly different results.
>
> Matthew
>
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20080816/9a51607b/attachment.html>