[plt-scheme] optimising syntax-check

I'll admit I'm being lazy-
I should
a) find the tests for syntax check
b) run them with the profiler turned on

s.



On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Jos Koot <jos.koot at telefonica.net> wrote:

>  I second that. Check syntax has become slow. It takes more than a minute
> consuming 100% processor time while coloring the syntax. This is
> with DrScheme, version 3.99.0.23-svn22apr2008 [3m] with Windows XP home.
> Previous releases needed 5 seconds for the same file.
> Jos Koot
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> *From:* Stephen De Gabrielle <spdegabrielle at gmail.com>
> *To:* PLT-list <plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu>
> *Sent:* Friday, April 25, 2008 10:28 AM
> *Subject:* [plt-scheme] optimising syntax-check
>
> Hi, I rely heavily on check-syntax to make sense of code (including my
> own).
>
> I was recently using it on sirmail/readr.ss but found it too slow for such
> a large file.
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions on how I might be able to get check syntax
> to run a little faster?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Stephen
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>
>


-- 
Cheers,

Stephen

--
Stephen De Gabrielle
s.degabrielle at ucl.ac.uk
Telephone +44 (0)20 7679 5242 (x45242)
Mobile 079 851 890 45
Project: Making Sense of Information (MaSI)
http://www.uclic.ucl.ac.uk/annb/MaSI.html

UCLIC: University College London Interaction Centre
http://www.uclic.ucl.ac.uk/

Remax House - 31/32 Alfred Place
London - WC1E 7DP
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20080425/b34b64f2/attachment.html>