[plt-scheme] Are new Schemers supposed to be reading SRFIs?

From: Chongkai Zhu (czhu at cs.utah.edu)
Date: Thu May 10 16:07:38 EDT 2007

This is a good suggestion. I'm going to do this. Thanks.

Chongkai

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Danny Yoo" <dyoo at cs.wpi.edu>
To: "Grant Rettke" <grettke at acm.org>
Cc: "mzscheme Mailing List" <plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu>
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: [plt-scheme] Are new Schemers supposed to be reading SRFIs?


>
> PLT Scheme does provide slightly more mnemonic informative module aliases 
> for the commonly used SRFI's.  We can take SRFI-1 (the list library) for 
> example; it can go by the following names:
>
>     (lib "1.ss" "srfi")
>     (lib "list.ss" "srfi" "1")
>
> But I'd love to see things taken further and just have:
>
>     (lib "list.ss" "srfi")
>
> work as well.  I don't think there will be so many similar SRFI's such 
> that module name collisions are likely to occur between any two SRFI's, 
> are there?



Posted on the users mailing list.