[plt-scheme] . nitpick .

Thanks guys. A tidbit like this might be pretty valuable for someone
starting out with Scheme and only wanting to focus on learning r5rs to
start.

In my case, I started out with Chez Scheme and used the 'r5rs', and
later tried out DrS when I wanted something more.

On 6/10/07, Jos Koot <jos.koot at telefonica.net> wrote:
> For the toplevel:
>
> (require (lib "r5rs" "lang"))
> (current-namespace (module->namespace '(lib "r5rs" "lang")))
>
> Jos Koot
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Grant Rettke" <grettke at acm.org>
> To: "Jos Koot" <jos.koot at telefonica.net>
> Cc: "Anton van Straaten" <anton at appsolutions.com>; "PLT Scheme"
> <plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu>
> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 6:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [plt-scheme] . nitpick .
>
>
> > Does that do something like saying that only the r5rs functions will
> > exist in the current name space?
> >
> > On 6/10/07, Jos Koot <jos.koot at telefonica.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Grant Rettke" <grettke at acm.org>
> >> To: "Jos Koot" <jos.koot at telefonica.net>
> >> Cc: "Anton van Straaten" <anton at appsolutions.com>; "PLT Scheme"
> >> <plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu>
> >> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 6:25 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [plt-scheme] . nitpick .
> >>
> >>
> >> >I wonder why there isn't a r5rs module.
> >>
> >> But there is: (lib "r5rs" "lang")
> >> Jos Koot
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > On 6/10/07, Jos Koot <jos.koot at telefonica.net> wrote:
> >> >> One could set (read-accept-dot #f) as default for language R5RS.
> >> >> Adding (read-accept-dot #f) to .../collects/r5rs/lang.ss does the trick,
> >> >> although another location may be more appropriate.
> >> >> Jos koot
> >> >>
> >> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> >> From: "Anton van Straaten" <anton at appsolutions.com>
> >> >> To: "PLT Scheme" <plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu>
> >> >> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 4:15 PM
> >> >> Subject: [plt-scheme] . nitpick .
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > Shouldn't the R5RS language level disallow the infix dot syntax?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > As seen in this message:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/msg/40f19cb9863cf28d
> >> >> >
> >> >> > ...someone experimenting can get confused by the infix feature.  It
> >> >> > would
> >> >> > be
> >> >> > helpful to be able to respond to that by saying "that's an extension --
> >> >> > use
> >> >> > the R5RS language level if you want to experiment with standard Scheme
> >> >> > behavior".  But here, we can't say that.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Anton
> >> >> >
> >> >> > _________________________________________________
> >> >> >  For list-related administrative tasks:
> >> >> >  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> _________________________________________________
> >> >>   For list-related administrative tasks:
> >> >>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>