[plt-scheme] . nitpick .

For the toplevel:

(require (lib "r5rs" "lang"))
(current-namespace (module->namespace '(lib "r5rs" "lang")))

Jos Koot

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Grant Rettke" <grettke at acm.org>
To: "Jos Koot" <jos.koot at telefonica.net>
Cc: "Anton van Straaten" <anton at appsolutions.com>; "PLT Scheme" 
<plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu>
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: [plt-scheme] . nitpick .


> Does that do something like saying that only the r5rs functions will
> exist in the current name space?
>
> On 6/10/07, Jos Koot <jos.koot at telefonica.net> wrote:
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Grant Rettke" <grettke at acm.org>
>> To: "Jos Koot" <jos.koot at telefonica.net>
>> Cc: "Anton van Straaten" <anton at appsolutions.com>; "PLT Scheme"
>> <plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu>
>> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 6:25 PM
>> Subject: Re: [plt-scheme] . nitpick .
>>
>>
>> >I wonder why there isn't a r5rs module.
>>
>> But there is: (lib "r5rs" "lang")
>> Jos Koot
>>
>>
>> >
>> > On 6/10/07, Jos Koot <jos.koot at telefonica.net> wrote:
>> >> One could set (read-accept-dot #f) as default for language R5RS.
>> >> Adding (read-accept-dot #f) to .../collects/r5rs/lang.ss does the trick,
>> >> although another location may be more appropriate.
>> >> Jos koot
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: "Anton van Straaten" <anton at appsolutions.com>
>> >> To: "PLT Scheme" <plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu>
>> >> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 4:15 PM
>> >> Subject: [plt-scheme] . nitpick .
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Shouldn't the R5RS language level disallow the infix dot syntax?
>> >> >
>> >> > As seen in this message:
>> >> >
>> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/msg/40f19cb9863cf28d
>> >> >
>> >> > ...someone experimenting can get confused by the infix feature.  It 
>> >> > would
>> >> > be
>> >> > helpful to be able to respond to that by saying "that's an extension --  
>> >> > use
>> >> > the R5RS language level if you want to experiment with standard Scheme
>> >> > behavior".  But here, we can't say that.
>> >> >
>> >> > Anton
>> >> >
>> >> > _________________________________________________
>> >> >  For list-related administrative tasks:
>> >> >  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> _________________________________________________
>> >>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>> >>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>