[plt-scheme] cost of closure?

Tuples differ from vectors that they are indexed both by name & numbers, but
if struct is a named vector, in that sense it won't really be different,
except struct is opaque and hence better for building AST than vector IMHO.

yinso

On 5/31/07, Carl Eastlund <cce at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>
> On 5/31/07, YC <yinso.chen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Will do ;)  I sure would be interested to see if anonymous struct (or
> tuple)
> > can be supported in PLT scheme, with support for ctor/dtors.
>
> How would this differ from vectors?
>
> --
> Carl Eastlund
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20070531/74eef9a9/attachment.html>