[plt-scheme] unit-based servlet vs module-based servlet?
Really?! Not being familiar with the history of PLT scheme I have to say I
am surprised by the answer - I would have thought module is an older
concept. Sounds like you are saying unit is slowly fading away?
Can module based servlets be loaded/unloaded on demand like unit-based
servlets? And would badly written module servlet bring down the server?
Unit servlets appear to handle the above fine, but if module servlet also
works, then I am not sure if there are discernible differences (although
there are still more unit-servlet examples in the doc).
Thanks,
yinso
On 4/11/07, Robby Findler <robby at cs.uchicago.edu> wrote:
>
> I suspect that most everyone wants to use module servlets these days,
> not unit servlets. Once upon a time, we didn't have modules (and
> servlets existed at that time), so we used units. Nowadays, modules
> work much better with all of our other tools (like the compiler, for
> example, but also the module browser and things like that), that you
> really want your program to be in a module.
>
> That said, of course, if your program calls for the power of units,
> use the units inside the module!
>
> Robby
>
> On 4/11/07, Yin-So Chen <yinso.chen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all -
> >
> > yet another newbie question - what is the difference between unit-based
> > servlet and module-based servlet and when to choose which? Are the two
> > comparable in terms of capabilities? I look at the unit doc and notices
> > that it is analogous to a pluggable component and hence appears to have
> more
> > flexibility and power than module, so was wondering under what
> situations
> > would a module servlet be preferrable over a unit servlet.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > yinso
> >
> > --
> > http://www.yinsochen.com
> > ...continuous learning...
> > _________________________________________________
> > For list-related administrative tasks:
> > http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
> >
> >
>
--
http://www.yinsochen.com
...continuous learning...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20070411/734e722c/attachment.html>