[plt-scheme] Re: license question

Thanks for clarification, Eli.

On 4/10/07, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
>
> On Apr 10, Yin-So Chen wrote:
> > Hi all -
> >
> > Not sure if this email got lost in the shuffle or not - I haven't
> > seen a response to this question.  Hopefully this is not a taboo
> > question ;)
>
> PLT is LGPL.  It says so in several places.
>
> There are some GPLs here an there, and they should all be fine.  ProfJ
> has Java code which has some exception (I don't remember the details),
> an interface to readline is fine to include as long as it is not used
> by default (see discussions in the list a few months ago).  The mime
> thing is probably old and nobody noticed it (Francisco: if you see
> this, mail me).
>
> --
>           ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>                   http://www.barzilay.org/                 Maze is Life!
>



-- 
http://www.yinsochen.com
...continuous learning...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20070410/2a652d40/attachment.html>