[plt-scheme] Re: license question

On Apr 10, Yin-So Chen wrote:
> Hi all -
> 
> Not sure if this email got lost in the shuffle or not - I haven't
> seen a response to this question.  Hopefully this is not a taboo
> question ;)

PLT is LGPL.  It says so in several places.

There are some GPLs here an there, and they should all be fine.  ProfJ
has Java code which has some exception (I don't remember the details),
an interface to readline is fine to include as long as it is not used
by default (see discussions in the list a few months ago).  The mime
thing is probably old and nobody noticed it (Francisco: if you see
this, mail me).

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                  http://www.barzilay.org/                 Maze is Life!