[plt-scheme] symbols redefined in SRFIs

On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 00:55 +0300, Dan Muresan wrote:
> > >>   (require (lib "list.ss" "1" "srfi"))
> > >
> > > [... at which point becomes clear to me that I'm again fighting a
> > > losing battle against an entrenched poor deisgn...]
> >
> > I might be litle slow, but which language construct has a poor design?
> 
> I was referring to the conflicts built into srfi-1. Again, I'm
> advocating just removing the non-SRFI-1 versions, or hiding them. Same
> for SRFI-43.

Wouldn't this break all the code that currently relies on the built-in
`reverse'? 

sam th