| From: Prabhakar Ragde (plragde at uwaterloo.ca) Date: Tue Nov 14 14:25:35 EST 2006 |
|
Dave Herman wrote: > Now I think I understand what your point was before -- IIUC, you weren't > saying that there is a single value dubbed "the unspecified value"; > rather, you were just saying that even in R5RS, the result of for-each > is still *specified*, it's just specified to be *any single value*. Wittgenstein would blush. --PR
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}