[plt-scheme] Please help test version 359.100

From: hufflen jean-michel (hufflen at lifc.univ-fcomte.fr)
Date: Tue Nov 14 14:05:28 EST 2006

>From samth at ccs.neu.edu  Tue Nov 14 19:53:05 2006

>You are mistaking the value #<void>, which the printer omits when it is
>the only value returned, for a lack of values.  Thus the following:
>	> (values)
>> (void)
>> (equal? (void) (void))
>> (equal? (void) (values))
>context expected 1 value, received 0 values

   OK, and thank U for this explanation.  However, such a design choice
complicates the situation.  If the printer does not put anything, that may be
because of a lack of values or zero value.  A lack of values may be what is
called an unspecified one within R5RS, or...



Posted on the users mailing list.