From: Doug Orleans (dougorleans at gmail.com) Date: Tue Feb 7 17:42:53 EST 2006 |
|
John Clements writes: > The term safe-for-space is (in my opinion) a poorly chosen term; it > has nothing to do with most definitions of 'safety.' That is, a > language that is not "safe-for-space" is not necessarily "unsafe." It's unsafe in that it could consume all available memory, no? --dougorleans at gmail.com
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|