[plt-scheme] keywords aren't isomorfic to symbols?

On Nov  7, Hans Oesterholt wrote:
> So I misinterpreted by assuming the use of keywords was closer to
> the use of symbols than to e.g. the use of strings?

They are closer to symbols in that you keywords with the same name are
eq?.


> What does this mean for the use of keywords from 'inside mzscheme'?
> 
> Thanks for the answers anyway. I'll need to modify more code then I
> assumed first to let keywords work for 'named arguments'.

There is a library that uses keywords for arguments.

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                  http://www.barzilay.org/                 Maze is Life!