From: John Kozak (jk at xylema.org) Date: Thu Mar 25 16:15:30 EST 2004 |
|
> SWIG is still static, which means that you need to compile stuff. > IMO, a far better approach is a dynamic facility. Oh, absolutely. There are advantages to SWIG, though: presumably, as it's the de facto standard, there'll be a (growing) library of bindings to all sorts of nice and useful stuff. Perhaps an interpretative back-end should be added to SWIG? John
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|