[plt-scheme] naming convention for structure constructor vs. wrapper?

From: Neil W. Van Dyke (neil at neilvandyke.org)
Date: Fri Jul 2 04:04:30 EDT 2004

Most missed at the moment is subtyping.
You'll find other useful features documented at:

Michael Sperber writes:
> Neil> I'm using SRFI-9 right now (for portability).  Worth noting is that
> Neil> SRFI-9 is pretty impoverished, functionality-wise, compared to
> Neil> "make-struct-type".
> In what way?

Posted on the users mailing list.