[plt-scheme] An Editors Tale

I didn't look for references, just definitions.  The definitions do seem to refere to methods like those.

k
At 05:03 PM 1/29/2004 -0500, Joe Marshall wrote:
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>
>Ken Anderson <kanderson at bbn.com> writes:
>
>> Thanks for this detailed reply.  While i've always favored simple
>> flexible languages, you've made their limits clear.
>>
>>  From my experience with Common Lisp, MOP level programming is
>>  typically done only occasionally to provide a specific capability,
>>  such as persistence.
>>
>> To make this quantitative, i looked at Jython 2.1a3, which i have on my machine.
>> I found 234 f*.py iles, with 3389 defs.  Here is a histogram of the top 10 def __... methods:
>>
>>     264  __init__
>>      54  __repr__
>>      12  __getitem__
>>      10  __getattr__
>>      10  __del__
>>       9  __setitem__
>>       9  __len__
>>       7  __delitem__
>>       5  __str__
>>       5  __cmp__
>
>What about references to things like  __dict__, __slots__, or
>__name__?