[plt-scheme] let-syntax bug

On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 04:59:20PM -0400, Andre van Tonder wrote:
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
> 
> > Bradd Szonye wrote: 
> > 
> > > As you point out, Scheme could
> > > have separate scoping rules for transformers and variables. 
> > 
> > >put DEFINE-SYNTAX inside LET-SYNTAX.) The language would need to define
> > >"transformer top level" and "variable/expression top level," and I think
> > >it would get confusing pretty quickly.
> 
> By the way, the best explanation of the these issues that I have
> seen is in the classic article by Al* Petrofsky:
> 
> http://groups.google.com/groups?&selm=87it8db0um.fsf%40radish.petrofsky.org

I've read that recently, but it didn't seem relevant to this discussion.
-- 
Bradd W. Szonye
http://www.szonye.com/bradd