[plt-scheme] let-syntax bug

> Bradd Szonye wrote: 
> 
> > As you point out, Scheme could
> > have separate scoping rules for transformers and variables. 
> 
> >put DEFINE-SYNTAX inside LET-SYNTAX.) The language would need to define
> >"transformer top level" and "variable/expression top level," and I think
> >it would get confusing pretty quickly.

By the way, the best explanation of the these issues that I have
seen is in the classic article by Al* Petrofsky:

http://groups.google.com/groups?&selm=87it8db0um.fsf%40radish.petrofsky.org