From: Paul Steckler (steck at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Fri May 9 12:28:03 EDT 2003 |
|
I have a syntax-rules macro that expands into a top-level definition, something like (define-syntax foo (syntax-rules () [(_ name e1 e2) (define name (bar e1 e2))])) Except I don't really want to define `name', I want to define `name-prime'. How can I build an identifier and still have a top-level definition? -- Paul (who doesn't know the macro system as well as he should)
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|