[plt-scheme] Comparison size installation executable - size installed drscheme

From: Dor Kleiman (dor at ntr.co.il)
Date: Mon Dec 1 05:56:36 EST 2003

I accidentally sent this message only to Robby, a few minutes ago.

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Dor Kleiman 
	Sent: ב 01/12/2003 10:16 
	To: Robby Findler 
	Cc: 
	Subject: RE: [plt-scheme] Comparison size installation executable - size installed drscheme
	
	
	I think he's comparing plt-setup.exe (or whatever the file name is) and the actual installed directory... That would be a logical ratio, since the installation compiles a lot of code and keeps the source, so it would grow quite a lot...

		-----Original Message----- 
		From: Robby Findler [mailto:robby at cs.uchicago.edu] 
		Sent: Mon 12/1/2003 5:44 AM 
		To: Guenther Schmidt 
		Cc: plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu 
		Subject: Re: [plt-scheme] Comparison size installation executable - size installed drscheme
		
		

		  For list-related administrative tasks:
		  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
		
		I'm sorry -- what are you comparing exactly? Are you comparing
		drscheme.exe to the result of making a stand alone executable? If so,
		that's not entirely unexpected. DrScheme.exe is not a standalone
		executable (it must be inside the plt tree to function, which is larger
		than 87 megabytes).
		
		Our standalone executable size needs work. It hasn't been a high
		priority, so far....
		
		Robby
		
		At Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:57:54 +0000, Guenther Schmidt wrote:
		>   For list-related administrative tasks:
		>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
		>
		> Hi,
		>
		> the ratio of these two seems to be 5,73 MB to 87,83 MB according to what
		> Windows XP is telling me.
		>
		> Can that be right?
		> I mean that ratio is extraordinary.
		>
		> Guenther
		>
		>
		>
		
		

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20031201/5186cffe/attachment.html>

Posted on the users mailing list.