[plt-scheme] srfi-0 cond-expand

> There sure is, because there's code out there that uses SRFI 7.  It
> doesn't solve all the problems, but it sure solves more than SRFI 0.

Can you give me an example that you consider uses it "the right way"?

> (I'm sorry if any of this came out as bashing your work---this is not
> what I intended.  I'm just hoping you'll volunteer for more of the
> same.)

No offence taken.  I expect a robust but fair examination from this list.
-- 
MJR|                                                                  v
---|--[ Luminas internet applications http://www.luminas.co.uk/ ]-----|
   `--[ http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ ]---------[ slef at jabber.at ]-----'