[plt-scheme] srfi-0 cond-expand

Michael Sperber [Mr.  Preprocessor] <sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> You really should be looking into implementing SRFI 7 instead.  Should
> be a lot easier as well.

I looked at SRFI 7, but it seems to contain more than I needed and some of
those other parts perpetuate problems which are a pain in standard Scheme. 
For example, how are the files named in (files <filename>+) located? 

It also looks like a way to load a Scheme program, rather than something to
write as part of a Scheme program to specify the features needed.  Of
course, I'd be happy to hear that I misunderstood it.

MJR