[racket-dev] [racket] Performance. Higher-order function

From: Leif Andersen (leif at leifandersen.net)
Date: Tue Aug 12 12:33:01 EDT 2014

> but my guess is that that will require some work internally to make
not be a pain for people who want to build from git

Wouldn't this be the ideal case for git submodules?


~Leif Andersen


On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Robby Findler <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu>
wrote:

> I think you'd have to add a dependency to the 'main-distribution' pkg,
> but my guess is that that will require some work internally to make
> not be a pain for people who want to build from git. If you have the
> inclination, you could give it a try locally and let us know how it
> goes?
>
> Robby
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Vincent St-Amour <stamourv at ccs.neu.edu>
> wrote:
> > Ok, let's try to do that. Is there currently a way to include packages
> > from 3rd party repos to the main distribution?
> >
> > Vincent
> >
> >
> > At Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:03:04 -0400,
> > Greg Hendershott wrote:
> >>
> >> > Being in the main repo is different from being in the distribution
> (and thus automatically installed). I think that OC should be there when
> you download the full bundle.
> >>
> >> Definitely.
> >>
> >> 1. It's very useful.
> >> 2. Its existence says, Racket optimization is a thing.
> >> 3. It's used with one of Racket's most appealing and unique facets,
> DrRacket.
> >> &c
> > _________________________
> >   Racket Developers list:
> >   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
> _________________________
>   Racket Developers list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20140812/6e6e95fd/attachment.html>

Posted on the dev mailing list.