[racket-dev] should package "X" imply package "X-test"?

From: Eli Barzilay (eli at barzilay.org)
Date: Tue Oct 15 22:40:54 EDT 2013

Just now, Robby Findler wrote:
> Yes, I think that was the point of the original message: to figure out what
> consistent thing we think it should be.

My point was in the "depending on what *I* generally want".  I'm
saying that it much better to leave it consistent per some user
choice, since there are different types of users; in contrast to
finding some global default that would work for everyone.  (Since I
believe there isn't such a default.)

> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
>     It would be nice if it implied some consistent default, depending on
>     what I generally want.  Ie, I can be someone who just want the minimum
>     -libs, or someone who always wants everything including the -tests.

          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!

Posted on the dev mailing list.