[racket-dev] should package "X" imply package "X-test"?

Yes, I think that was the point of the original message: to figure out what
consistent thing we think it should be.

Robby


On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:

> It would be nice if it implied some consistent default, depending on
> what I generally want.  Ie, I can be someone who just want the minimum
> -libs, or someone who always wants everything including the -tests.
> --
>           ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>                     http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
> _________________________
>   Racket Developers list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20131015/58476afb/attachment.html>