[racket-dev] drracket interactivity testing help request

Yeah, I've noticed it'd be nice to have something like that too .... maybe
someday. :)

Robby


On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Ray Racine <ray.racine at gmail.com> wrote:

> Well I switched to dedicated "open in a new tab" which I do like more
> overall than 1-1 source file to window.  Nothing to compare against but its
> PDQ for me.  Just counted, have 14 tabs open currently.
>
> One drawback with tabs is the loss of side-by-side source, where it is
> easy in Linux/Unity to left-right align two windows with 1-1 source file
> <-> window.  One nice thing to have would be able to split the Racket
> window vertically where all the tabs take up half the vertical window split
> on the left.   When you are this vertical split mode, right-clicking tab
> shows the tab on the right-side in lieu of raising it to the forefront of
> all the other tabs on the left or something like that.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Neil Toronto <neil.toronto at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On 01/06/2013 08:03 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
>>
>>> As you (hopefully) noticed, I've spent a bunch of time this release
>>> cycle trying to improve drracket's interactivity and I'm at the point
>>> now where I could use a little help testing. So, if you have any time to
>>> play with the latest from git (or a nightly build after tonight) and
>>> notice that certain things you do make drracket more sluggish, can you
>>> please let me know?
>>>
>>
>> I haven't noticed extra sluggishness, but I have noticed that switching
>> tabs is faster. Since I do that a lot, you have my thanks. :)
>>
>> Neil ⊥
>>
>> _________________________
>>  Racket Developers list:
>>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/**dev <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev>
>>
>
>
> _________________________
>   Racket Developers list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20130108/2caaedea/attachment.html>