[racket-dev] , en and enter! sometimes do nothing, and it's changing over releases?

That would be great! It would make for such a smoother experience
switching between DrRacket and Emacs. (DrRacket is awesome for Racket.
Emacs is awesome for multi-language projects.)

I remember staring at the Emacs Scheme mode menu the first time and
thinking, "Huh?? Where's the 'Run' command?'" It took me awhile to
figure out some rough equivalent. Even today I find myself wanting a
closer equivalent.

At some point soon I probably ought to pop the stack (resume working
on my main project instead of on my tool chain). I'll set a timer and
see how much progress I can make on this myself before I'd need to set
it aside.

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Robby Findler
<robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> IMO, DrRacket-like functionality would be nice to have in an Emacs setting
> and probably using a sandbox is the way to get it. You'd want to not use the
> default settings for the sandbox, tho, but give more permissions for file
> access (and probably a few other things).
>
> Robby
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
>>
>> 9 hours ago, Greg Hendershott wrote:
>> > I'm inclined to add a new command to XREPL that takes that approach,
>> > to experiment. I was spelunking in DrRacket source but I'm slow to
>> > isolate that from what else is going on. It sounds like you
>> > understand it; is there a code sample you could share?
>>
>> I'm not sure what exactly you're after, but you can get most of that
>> using a ,switch command to create a new namespace, then using it with
>> a "!" flag to reset it.
>>
>> --
>>           ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>>                     http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
>> _________________________
>>   Racket Developers list:
>>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
>
>