[racket-dev] url->string: what do we do?

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
> Two days ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>> Eli, I think your comments generally make sense here, but I don't
>> see how they help us make concrete resolving what to do with
>> string->url and the commit.
>>
>> As things stand, my inclination would be to try to find a simpler
>> regexp that doesn't cost as much in the contract and leave that
>> checked in until you get to the changes that you want to do.
>
> I'm fine with that (and with the push that does it), as long as it's
> clear that this would change if it grows to be more than just a regexp
> match.  (Hence my question whether the second regexp is needed -- if
> it's just the first one, then it looks like it already allows other
> schemas, to be parsed further in the code.)

I'm not quite following this paragraph, but I think we're in
agreement. I've already pushed the change and my inference is that
you'd be happy with it (I put some timing numbers in the commit.).

Robby