[racket-dev] url->string: what do we do?

Two days ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> Eli, I think your comments generally make sense here, but I don't
> see how they help us make concrete resolving what to do with
> string->url and the commit.
> 
> As things stand, my inclination would be to try to find a simpler
> regexp that doesn't cost as much in the contract and leave that
> checked in until you get to the changes that you want to do.

I'm fine with that (and with the push that does it), as long as it's
clear that this would change if it grows to be more than just a regexp
match.  (Hence my question whether the second regexp is needed -- if
it's just the first one, then it looks like it already allows other
schemas, to be parsed further in the code.)

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!