[racket-dev] first and rest in racket/base

Throw cons? in with empty?, please.

Carl Eastlund



On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Asumu Takikawa <asumu at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:

> On 2012-12-13 12:44:38 -0500, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
> > Does this sound reasonable?
>
> +1. While we're at it, might as well also put at least `empty` and
> `empty?` in there too. These trip me up as well.
>
> Cheers,
> Asumu
> _________________________
>   Racket Developers list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20121213/44f44ffc/attachment-0001.html>