| From: Prabhakar Ragde (plragde at uwaterloo.ca) Date: Thu Oct 6 14:04:58 EDT 2011 |
|
Sam wrote: > Unlike, say, `syntax-parse', `match' isn't designed for the use-case > of building ASTs while matching. Wait, what? That's exactly what I want to use it for when writing toy interpreters for pedagogical purposes. Or am I misunderstanding what you're saying here? I want to do PLAI-style things, but with `match' instead of `type-case'. --PR
| Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}