[racket-dev] Missing pregexp syntax in Racket

From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Tue Nov 29 15:43:27 EST 2011

On Nov 29, 2011, at 3:41 PM, Norman Gray wrote:

> 
> What Neil said _and_ what Shivers said!
> 
> Implementing Shivers-style SREs would be a much bigger win than any alternate pregexp syntax with differently funky backslash rules from everything else.


So, any volunteers? 




Posted on the dev mailing list.